"Korean is the world's most superior language"
Astounding news from respected University of Hawaii professor of linguistics Sohn Ho-min:
"When we say Korean is superior, we are basing this on scientific examination. The Korean language's method of making sound through a combination of vowels and consonants is very scientific and economical, even."And we can believe it because in this Korea Herald article, "Korean language scientifically superior," the reporter, Shin Hae-in, assures us that:
"As a scholar who has spent the past four decades studying his mother-tongue and language in general, professor Sohn Ho-min should know what he's talking about when he says Korean is the world's most superior language."Unfortunately, the article never explains in what way the "combination of vowels and consonants" in Korean is "scientifically superior" because the term "scientific" remains undefined, unless this has some connection to "economical," but that term seems to be a separate adjective, intended to describe the language, not to define "scientific."
Moreover, I have to wonder if this reporter has really understood Professor Sohn Ho-min. Perhaps the good professor actually is a linguistic chauvinist, but a close reading of the entire article does not turn up an exact quote with Sohn claiming that "Korean is the world's most superior language." The reporter supposedly paraphrases Sohn as saying this, but no quote is provided.
I presume that Sohn was speaking in Korean, and I suspect that Sohn was talking not about the Korean language (한국말, Hangungmal), but about the Korean alphabet (한글, Hangul), instead. In that case, the statement by Sohn would read:
"The Korean alphabet's method of making sound through a combination of vowels and consonants is very scientific and economical, even."If Sohn said that and maintained merely that "When we say the Korean alphabet is superior, we are basing this on scientific examination," then his statement is more reasonable, for he's not speaking of a natural language but of an invented alphabet, and he does not directly state that the Korean alphabet is "the world's most superior" alphabet.
Sohn might, of course, actually mean that it is "the world's most superior" alphabet, and if so, then his statement is the problematic sort of nationalist claim that Koreans often make about Korea's writing system, i.e., Hangul, but offering only reasons that seem unconvincing to most non-Koreans.
But I'd need to know exactly what Sohn claimed.
Labels: Korean Language



14 Comments:
I think alot about language and I have concluded that the English language is superior. I have good reasons (I think) but I wonder if I am just being chauvinistic. Here are my reasons:
1. It is not tonal, so you can mispronounce words and its not a disaster.
2. It has an alphabet of 26 letters, not 5000 pictures or any of the other more difficult options.
3. It is relatively easy to learn,you can absolutely mangle it and still be understood, though it is difficult to master.
4. People all over the world use it to communicate so, and I believe that all these conversations have to do with 'which should be the one language', it already has a hand up.
5. It is enormously adaptable, it is still a creative language.
Spanish meets all these requirements, also. I still think English is superior to Spanish just because. That could be chauvinism.
What do you think?
Whitney
Spanish nouns have gender, an unnecessary complication, so English wins!
On the other hand, if we're talking about English spelling . . .
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
I am so glad you said that about the gender issue. English does win.
I'm a terrible speller so I am not much of a spelling stickler. I just read a book called The Information that, at one point, went into a history of the written English language. So many of the words we use have changed so much, we only say it one is correct because it is used contemporaneously.
I used spell check.
Spelling is always behind the curve of change . . .
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Well, Pidgin is almost certainly the easiest language in the world to learn.
Bahasa Indonesian is fairly easy.
And's that's just two that I actually know.
I'm sure there are many more.
Right. There are undoubtedly many languages easier to learn than English.
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
I find the differences between 'the queens english' and american english fascinating. I am really glad that Noah Webster thought the US needed its own language and streamlined the spelling. It turned it into a more efficient language. And in addition to my other reasons for preferring English, I will add that I prefer American English for its efficiency in a spelling and nouns. I mean, we call a pull-over a pull-over because we pull it over our heads. Why do the English call it a jumper? There are a bunch of examples of this. Of course, no person can deny that the English are masters of slang and perhaps produce a more colorful language.
Actually, I doubt that people can reach any agreement on which languages are better and which worse.
Suppose somebody were to observe that English has a larger vocabulary than any other language and then used that as evidence for English superiority as a language.
A critic could reasonably ask why that is a criterion.
Does anybody actually know all those words? Does a language really need so many words? Don't the excessive number of words make English harder to learn? And so on . . .
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Well, all those words is part of the difficulty of mastering English. So, us novices leave it to the likes of Christopher Hitchens to learn them all and then delight us with them.
Okay, I'll learn them all . . . starting tomorrow.
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Oh good, but remember, you must learn and delight.
I had a flight connecting in Seoul once and I remember walking around that high tech airport thinking that the Korean language was one of the most interesting looking languages. I really liked looking at it but I can't find the right word to describe how much. Blast!
"Blast"? Don't use that word in an airport!
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
I wrote that Hangul from a scientific perspective is actually inefficient compared to Chinese, Hiragana & Katakana, and even the Roman alphabet: Against Hangul Supremacy and "A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words".
No one language I think can be said to be "superior."
Yes, I recall reading those. Thanks for the links.
Jeffery Hodges
* * *
Post a Comment
<< Home